<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;n Beter Wêreld, &#8216;n haai gee geboorte, Umberto Eco en stede wat weer plase word</title>
	<atom:link href="http://riviersonderend.net/2009/11/14/n-beter-wereld-n-haai-gee-geboorte-umberto-eco-en-stede-wat-weer-plase-word/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://riviersonderend.net/2009/11/14/n-beter-wereld-n-haai-gee-geboorte-umberto-eco-en-stede-wat-weer-plase-word/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 10:05:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Maru</title>
		<link>http://riviersonderend.net/2009/11/14/n-beter-wereld-n-haai-gee-geboorte-umberto-eco-en-stede-wat-weer-plase-word/#comment-4040</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[George Maru]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 05:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riviersonderend.net/?p=963#comment-4040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Andrew ek stem saam met jou. Tog dink ek dit waarmee sy besig is, verdien ondersteuning.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew ek stem saam met jou. Tog dink ek dit waarmee sy besig is, verdien ondersteuning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://riviersonderend.net/2009/11/14/n-beter-wereld-n-haai-gee-geboorte-umberto-eco-en-stede-wat-weer-plase-word/#comment-4038</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 06:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riviersonderend.net/?p=963#comment-4038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ek vind Karen Armstrong ‘n bietjie eienaardig, sy weet god bestaan nie maar klou nog steeds nostalgies vas aan die hele konsep van ‘n kosmiese alleenheerser. Dawkins het amper sekerlik na haar verwys toe hy geskryf het:

&lt;blockquote&gt; “Now, there is a certain class of sophisticated modern theologian who will say something like this: &quot;Good heavens, of course we are not so naive or simplistic as to care whether God exists. Existence is such a 19th-century preoccupation! It doesn&#039;t matter whether God exists in a scientific sense. What matters is whether he exists for you or for me. If God is real for you, who cares whether science has made him redundant? Such arrogance! Such elitism.&quot;
Well, if that&#039;s what floats your canoe, you&#039;ll be paddling it up a very lonely creek. The mainstream belief of the world&#039;s peoples is very clear. They believe in God, and that means they believe he exists in objective reality, just as surely as the Rock of Gibraltar exists. If sophisticated theologians or postmodern relativists think they are rescuing God from the redundancy scrap-heap by downplaying the importance of existence, they should think again. Tell the congregation of a church or mosque that existence is too vulgar an attribute to fasten onto their God, and they will brand you an atheist. They&#039;ll be right. “ &lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ek vind Karen Armstrong ‘n bietjie eienaardig, sy weet god bestaan nie maar klou nog steeds nostalgies vas aan die hele konsep van ‘n kosmiese alleenheerser. Dawkins het amper sekerlik na haar verwys toe hy geskryf het:</p>
<blockquote><p> “Now, there is a certain class of sophisticated modern theologian who will say something like this: &#8220;Good heavens, of course we are not so naive or simplistic as to care whether God exists. Existence is such a 19th-century preoccupation! It doesn&#8217;t matter whether God exists in a scientific sense. What matters is whether he exists for you or for me. If God is real for you, who cares whether science has made him redundant? Such arrogance! Such elitism.&#8221;<br />
Well, if that&#8217;s what floats your canoe, you&#8217;ll be paddling it up a very lonely creek. The mainstream belief of the world&#8217;s peoples is very clear. They believe in God, and that means they believe he exists in objective reality, just as surely as the Rock of Gibraltar exists. If sophisticated theologians or postmodern relativists think they are rescuing God from the redundancy scrap-heap by downplaying the importance of existence, they should think again. Tell the congregation of a church or mosque that existence is too vulgar an attribute to fasten onto their God, and they will brand you an atheist. They&#8217;ll be right. “ </p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

